Comments on: MORE Problems With FeedBurner http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/ Build your business by sharing what you know Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Daniel Scocco http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1769 Daniel Scocco Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:38:50 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1769 let me know if this helps http://www.dailyblogtips.com/manage-feed-count-fluctuations/ let me know if this helps

http://www.dailyblogtips.com/manage-feed-count-fluctuations/

]]> By: Daniel Scocco http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14968 Daniel Scocco Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:38:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14968 let me know if this helps http://www.dailyblogtips.com/manage-feed-count-fluctuations/ let me know if this helps

http://www.dailyblogtips.com/manage-feed-count-fluctuations/

]]> By: Daniel Scocco http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14969 Daniel Scocco Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:38:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14969 let me know if this helps http://www.dailyblogtips.com/manage-feed-count-fluctuations/ let me know if this helps

http://www.dailyblogtips.com/manage-feed-count-fluctuations/

]]> By: Paula Mooney http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1741 Paula Mooney Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:58:07 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1741 Yeah, my numbers were swinging up and down this weekend, too. I was praising God that they jumped up, now they dipped a bit, but I pray they even out and grow, grow, grow! Yeah, my numbers were swinging up and down this weekend, too.

I was praising God that they jumped up, now they dipped a bit, but I pray they even out and grow, grow, grow!

]]> By: Paula Mooney http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14966 Paula Mooney Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:58:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14966 Yeah, my numbers were swinging up and down this weekend, too. I was praising God that they jumped up, now they dipped a bit, but I pray they even out and grow, grow, grow! Yeah, my numbers were swinging up and down this weekend, too.

I was praising God that they jumped up, now they dipped a bit, but I pray they even out and grow, grow, grow!

]]> By: Paula Mooney http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14967 Paula Mooney Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:58:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14967 Yeah, my numbers were swinging up and down this weekend, too. I was praising God that they jumped up, now they dipped a bit, but I pray they even out and grow, grow, grow! Yeah, my numbers were swinging up and down this weekend, too.

I was praising God that they jumped up, now they dipped a bit, but I pray they even out and grow, grow, grow!

]]> By: Dawud Miracle http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1730 Dawud Miracle Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:03:07 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1730 That's been my experience, too, Chris. One thing I've noticed is that when I don't post, more often than not, my stats decrease. For instance, there are many weekends I don't post. So by Monday morning, I can somethings loose a significant number of 'subscribers.' I just assume they're bots from directories and search engines that grow as I post more and then drop off when I post less. That’s been my experience, too, Chris. One thing I’ve noticed is that when I don’t post, more often than not, my stats decrease. For instance, there are many weekends I don’t post. So by Monday morning, I can somethings loose a significant number of ‘subscribers.’ I just assume they’re bots from directories and search engines that grow as I post more and then drop off when I post less.

]]> By: Dawud Miracle http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14964 Dawud Miracle Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:03:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14964 That's been my experience, too, Chris. One thing I've noticed is that when I don't post, more often than not, my stats decrease. For instance, there are many weekends I don't post. So by Monday morning, I can somethings loose a significant number of 'subscribers.' I just assume they're bots from directories and search engines that grow as I post more and then drop off when I post less. That’s been my experience, too, Chris. One thing I’ve noticed is that when I don’t post, more often than not, my stats decrease. For instance, there are many weekends I don’t post. So by Monday morning, I can somethings loose a significant number of ‘subscribers.’ I just assume they’re bots from directories and search engines that grow as I post more and then drop off when I post less.

]]> By: Dawud Miracle http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14965 Dawud Miracle Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:03:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14965 That's been my experience, too, Chris. One thing I've noticed is that when I don't post, more often than not, my stats decrease. For instance, there are many weekends I don't post. So by Monday morning, I can somethings loose a significant number of 'subscribers.' I just assume they're bots from directories and search engines that grow as I post more and then drop off when I post less. That’s been my experience, too, Chris. One thing I’ve noticed is that when I don’t post, more often than not, my stats decrease. For instance, there are many weekends I don’t post. So by Monday morning, I can somethings loose a significant number of ‘subscribers.’ I just assume they’re bots from directories and search engines that grow as I post more and then drop off when I post less.

]]> By: Chris Garrett http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1694 Chris Garrett Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:02:03 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1694 Looks like these ups, downs and bumps are something we have to live with, thanks guys :) Looks like these ups, downs and bumps are something we have to live with, thanks guys :)

]]> By: Chris Garrett http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14962 Chris Garrett Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:02:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14962 Looks like these ups, downs and bumps are something we have to live with, thanks guys :) Looks like these ups, downs and bumps are something we have to live with, thanks guys :)

]]> By: Chris Garrett http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14963 Chris Garrett Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:02:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14963 Looks like these ups, downs and bumps are something we have to live with, thanks guys :) Looks like these ups, downs and bumps are something we have to live with, thanks guys :)

]]> By: Leonard Chen http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1682 Leonard Chen Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:01:14 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1682 The last time I encountered this with my previous domain, I wrote to them. The reply, as I understand from it, has to do with their daily reporting. Feedburner subscriber numbers only get updated once every 24 hours depending on the number of people who reads your post in their feed reader. Since not everyone will read your feed in the same 24 hour period, those numbers thus report those who did. This is at most times the reason why the numbers in feedcount is always flucuating. The last time I encountered this with my previous domain, I wrote to them. The reply, as I understand from it, has to do with their daily reporting.

Feedburner subscriber numbers only get updated once every 24 hours depending on the number of people who reads your post in their feed reader.

Since not everyone will read your feed in the same 24 hour period, those numbers thus report those who did.

This is at most times the reason why the numbers in feedcount is always flucuating.

]]> By: Leonard Chen http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14960 Leonard Chen Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:01:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14960 The last time I encountered this with my previous domain, I wrote to them. The reply, as I understand from it, has to do with their daily reporting. Feedburner subscriber numbers only get updated once every 24 hours depending on the number of people who reads your post in their feed reader. Since not everyone will read your feed in the same 24 hour period, those numbers thus report those who did. This is at most times the reason why the numbers in feedcount is always flucuating. The last time I encountered this with my previous domain, I wrote to them. The reply, as I understand from it, has to do with their daily reporting.

Feedburner subscriber numbers only get updated once every 24 hours depending on the number of people who reads your post in their feed reader.

Since not everyone will read your feed in the same 24 hour period, those numbers thus report those who did.

This is at most times the reason why the numbers in feedcount is always flucuating.

]]> By: Leonard Chen http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14961 Leonard Chen Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:01:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14961 The last time I encountered this with my previous domain, I wrote to them. The reply, as I understand from it, has to do with their daily reporting. Feedburner subscriber numbers only get updated once every 24 hours depending on the number of people who reads your post in their feed reader. Since not everyone will read your feed in the same 24 hour period, those numbers thus report those who did. This is at most times the reason why the numbers in feedcount is always flucuating. The last time I encountered this with my previous domain, I wrote to them. The reply, as I understand from it, has to do with their daily reporting.

Feedburner subscriber numbers only get updated once every 24 hours depending on the number of people who reads your post in their feed reader.

Since not everyone will read your feed in the same 24 hour period, those numbers thus report those who did.

This is at most times the reason why the numbers in feedcount is always flucuating.

]]> By: Andy Beard http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1680 Andy Beard Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:12:52 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1680 Certainly I think it was Thursday the feed counter didn't relate to the numbers inside the interface, though now the numbers represent what was on the counter. Also if someone links through to you, e.g. Robert Scoble, that can actually cause the numbers to go up based on links from their feed. I just look at it like any stat - it varies a lot, but I think any reader can tell that Techcrunch have a few more readers than my blog, and I have maybe a few more readers than many new bloggers (though my blog is fairly new) Certainly I think it was Thursday the feed counter didn’t relate to the numbers inside the interface, though now the numbers represent what was on the counter.

Also if someone links through to you, e.g. Robert Scoble, that can actually cause the numbers to go up based on links from their feed.

I just look at it like any stat – it varies a lot, but I think any reader can tell that Techcrunch have a few more readers than my blog, and I have maybe a few more readers than many new bloggers (though my blog is fairly new)

]]> By: AndyBeard http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14958 AndyBeard Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:12:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14958 Certainly I think it was Thursday the feed counter didn't relate to the numbers inside the interface, though now the numbers represent what was on the counter. Also if someone links through to you, e.g. Robert Scoble, that can actually cause the numbers to go up based on links from their feed. I just look at it like any stat - it varies a lot, but I think any reader can tell that Techcrunch have a few more readers than my blog, and I have maybe a few more readers than many new bloggers (though my blog is fairly new) Certainly I think it was Thursday the feed counter didn’t relate to the numbers inside the interface, though now the numbers represent what was on the counter.

Also if someone links through to you, e.g. Robert Scoble, that can actually cause the numbers to go up based on links from their feed.

I just look at it like any stat – it varies a lot, but I think any reader can tell that Techcrunch have a few more readers than my blog, and I have maybe a few more readers than many new bloggers (though my blog is fairly new)

]]> By: AndyBeard http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14959 AndyBeard Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:12:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14959 Certainly I think it was Thursday the feed counter didn't relate to the numbers inside the interface, though now the numbers represent what was on the counter. Also if someone links through to you, e.g. Robert Scoble, that can actually cause the numbers to go up based on links from their feed. I just look at it like any stat - it varies a lot, but I think any reader can tell that Techcrunch have a few more readers than my blog, and I have maybe a few more readers than many new bloggers (though my blog is fairly new) Certainly I think it was Thursday the feed counter didn’t relate to the numbers inside the interface, though now the numbers represent what was on the counter.

Also if someone links through to you, e.g. Robert Scoble, that can actually cause the numbers to go up based on links from their feed.

I just look at it like any stat – it varies a lot, but I think any reader can tell that Techcrunch have a few more readers than my blog, and I have maybe a few more readers than many new bloggers (though my blog is fairly new)

]]> By: Kirk M http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1669 Kirk M Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:21:02 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-1669 Just to make clear here... I'm using the new Performancing metrics to bounce my <i>site stats</i> against FeedBurner's site stats. I believe pmetrics is site stats only. Sorry if there was any misinterpretation. Just to make clear here…

I’m using the new Performancing metrics to bounce my
site stats against FeedBurner’s site stats. I believe pmetrics is site stats only. Sorry if there was any misinterpretation.

]]> By: Kirk M http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14956 Kirk M Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:21:00 +0000 http://www.chrisg.com/more-problems-with-feedburner/#comment-14956 Just to make clear here... I'm using the new Performancing metrics to bounce my <i>site stats</i> against FeedBurner's site stats. I believe pmetrics is site stats only. Sorry if there was any misinterpretation. Just to make clear here…

I’m using the new Performancing metrics to bounce my
site stats against FeedBurner’s site stats. I believe pmetrics is site stats only. Sorry if there was any misinterpretation.

]]>