<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fake Blogging to be Criminalized in UK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/</link>
	<description>Build your business by sharing what you know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeathMitten</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8339</link>
		<dc:creator>DeathMitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8339</guid>
		<description>And of course, this will not grow to create public censorship of the Internet. No sirrah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, this will not grow to create public censorship of the Internet. No sirrah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeathMitten</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19331</link>
		<dc:creator>DeathMitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19331</guid>
		<description>And of course, this will not grow to create public censorship of the Internet. No sirrah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, this will not grow to create public censorship of the Internet. No sirrah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhay</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8330</link>
		<dc:creator>jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8330</guid>
		<description>Just how would they enforce this law is what really gets me thinking.  Jurisdiction and practical enforcement issues are going to be raised again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just how would they enforce this law is what really gets me thinking.  Jurisdiction and practical enforcement issues are going to be raised again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhay</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19330</link>
		<dc:creator>jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19330</guid>
		<description>Just how would they enforce this law is what really gets me thinking.  Jurisdiction and practical enforcement issues are going to be raised again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just how would they enforce this law is what really gets me thinking.  Jurisdiction and practical enforcement issues are going to be raised again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8327</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8327</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting question, and I can see arguments for both sides of the issue.

It will be interesting to see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting question, and I can see arguments for both sides of the issue.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19329</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19329</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting question, and I can see arguments for both sides of the issue.

It will be interesting to see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting question, and I can see arguments for both sides of the issue.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8326</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8326</guid>
		<description>@Rhys - check out this link to learn more about astroturfing:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Astroturf

Where do we draw the line with advertising?  Isn&#039;t all advertising about trying to make us feel good somehow, so we can buy the wonderful product that promises this illustrious goodie?  Isn&#039;t it all basically a trumped up lie?  

In the US there is a big movement afoot called &quot;Greenwashing,&quot; usually the big multinationals participate in, the party line going something like this,&quot;oh, look at the enviromentally friendly way we get our oil...isn&#039;t it nice?&quot;  And then happy people flood the commercial.  Where are the happy caribou?  I betcha they&#039;re not happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rhys &#8211; check out this link to learn more about astroturfing:<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Astroturf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Astroturf</a></p>
<p>Where do we draw the line with advertising?  Isn&#8217;t all advertising about trying to make us feel good somehow, so we can buy the wonderful product that promises this illustrious goodie?  Isn&#8217;t it all basically a trumped up lie?  </p>
<p>In the US there is a big movement afoot called &#8220;Greenwashing,&#8221; usually the big multinationals participate in, the party line going something like this,&#8221;oh, look at the enviromentally friendly way we get our oil&#8230;isn&#8217;t it nice?&#8221;  And then happy people flood the commercial.  Where are the happy caribou?  I betcha they&#8217;re not happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19328</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19328</guid>
		<description>@Rhys - check out this link to learn more about astroturfing:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Astroturf

Where do we draw the line with advertising?  Isn&#039;t all advertising about trying to make us feel good somehow, so we can buy the wonderful product that promises this illustrious goodie?  Isn&#039;t it all basically a trumped up lie?  

In the US there is a big movement afoot called &quot;Greenwashing,&quot; usually the big multinationals participate in, the party line going something like this,&quot;oh, look at the enviromentally friendly way we get our oil...isn&#039;t it nice?&quot;  And then happy people flood the commercial.  Where are the happy caribou?  I betcha they&#039;re not happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rhys &#8211; check out this link to learn more about astroturfing:<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Astroturf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Astroturf</a></p>
<p>Where do we draw the line with advertising?  Isn&#8217;t all advertising about trying to make us feel good somehow, so we can buy the wonderful product that promises this illustrious goodie?  Isn&#8217;t it all basically a trumped up lie?  </p>
<p>In the US there is a big movement afoot called &#8220;Greenwashing,&#8221; usually the big multinationals participate in, the party line going something like this,&#8221;oh, look at the enviromentally friendly way we get our oil&#8230;isn&#8217;t it nice?&#8221;  And then happy people flood the commercial.  Where are the happy caribou?  I betcha they&#8217;re not happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8325</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8325</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with all what seems to be the common opinion that, whether intentionally or not, this law will likely only result in censorship. If I write a fictional blog for the purposes of a business (not a flog or splog, but rather a blog written from the perspective of, say, a company mascot), would that be affected by this law?

I think the market it doing a pretty good job of calling out and &quot;ruining&quot; astroturf blogs as it is. We don&#039;t need legislation in this regard. The concept behind it---a sort of &quot;truth in advertising&quot; thing---is a good one, but it seems to have too much potential to result in censorship of legitimate blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with all what seems to be the common opinion that, whether intentionally or not, this law will likely only result in censorship. If I write a fictional blog for the purposes of a business (not a flog or splog, but rather a blog written from the perspective of, say, a company mascot), would that be affected by this law?</p>
<p>I think the market it doing a pretty good job of calling out and &#8220;ruining&#8221; astroturf blogs as it is. We don&#8217;t need legislation in this regard. The concept behind it&#8212;a sort of &#8220;truth in advertising&#8221; thing&#8212;is a good one, but it seems to have too much potential to result in censorship of legitimate blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19327</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19327</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with all what seems to be the common opinion that, whether intentionally or not, this law will likely only result in censorship. If I write a fictional blog for the purposes of a business (not a flog or splog, but rather a blog written from the perspective of, say, a company mascot), would that be affected by this law?

I think the market it doing a pretty good job of calling out and &quot;ruining&quot; astroturf blogs as it is. We don&#039;t need legislation in this regard. The concept behind it---a sort of &quot;truth in advertising&quot; thing---is a good one, but it seems to have too much potential to result in censorship of legitimate blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with all what seems to be the common opinion that, whether intentionally or not, this law will likely only result in censorship. If I write a fictional blog for the purposes of a business (not a flog or splog, but rather a blog written from the perspective of, say, a company mascot), would that be affected by this law?</p>
<p>I think the market it doing a pretty good job of calling out and &#8220;ruining&#8221; astroturf blogs as it is. We don&#8217;t need legislation in this regard. The concept behind it&#8212;a sort of &#8220;truth in advertising&#8221; thing&#8212;is a good one, but it seems to have too much potential to result in censorship of legitimate blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8323</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8323</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why we need new laws to fix something that isn&#039;t broken. Maybe we need a law to stop those scammers from sending me notices that I have won gazillions in some fake lottery or an unknown benefactor in Nigeria wants to get me some money.....but only if I send them a couple thousand to cover their costs. I&#039;m sure the masses need protection from them.

People can figure this stuff out....if it is a bogus blog eventually it will die. I say no censoring to &quot;protect&quot; me, I can&#039;t figure it out myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why we need new laws to fix something that isn&#8217;t broken. Maybe we need a law to stop those scammers from sending me notices that I have won gazillions in some fake lottery or an unknown benefactor in Nigeria wants to get me some money&#8230;..but only if I send them a couple thousand to cover their costs. I&#8217;m sure the masses need protection from them.</p>
<p>People can figure this stuff out&#8230;.if it is a bogus blog eventually it will die. I say no censoring to &#8220;protect&#8221; me, I can&#8217;t figure it out myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19326</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19326</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why we need new laws to fix something that isn&#039;t broken. Maybe we need a law to stop those scammers from sending me notices that I have won gazillions in some fake lottery or an unknown benefactor in Nigeria wants to get me some money.....but only if I send them a couple thousand to cover their costs. I&#039;m sure the masses need protection from them.

People can figure this stuff out....if it is a bogus blog eventually it will die. I say no censoring to &quot;protect&quot; me, I can&#039;t figure it out myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why we need new laws to fix something that isn&#8217;t broken. Maybe we need a law to stop those scammers from sending me notices that I have won gazillions in some fake lottery or an unknown benefactor in Nigeria wants to get me some money&#8230;..but only if I send them a couple thousand to cover their costs. I&#8217;m sure the masses need protection from them.</p>
<p>People can figure this stuff out&#8230;.if it is a bogus blog eventually it will die. I say no censoring to &#8220;protect&#8221; me, I can&#8217;t figure it out myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8321</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8321</guid>
		<description>Wow. This is a terrible idea. a) These things aren&#039;t exactly a danger to anyone. b) The market seems to be doing a pretty good job of taking care of this as both companies cited had suffered bad PR from their misadventures.

Ming is right. This is totally censorship. I can&#039;t wait to see the unintended consequences of this law of it passes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This is a terrible idea. a) These things aren&#8217;t exactly a danger to anyone. b) The market seems to be doing a pretty good job of taking care of this as both companies cited had suffered bad PR from their misadventures.</p>
<p>Ming is right. This is totally censorship. I can&#8217;t wait to see the unintended consequences of this law of it passes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19325</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19325</guid>
		<description>Wow. This is a terrible idea. a) These things aren&#039;t exactly a danger to anyone. b) The market seems to be doing a pretty good job of taking care of this as both companies cited had suffered bad PR from their misadventures.

Ming is right. This is totally censorship. I can&#039;t wait to see the unintended consequences of this law of it passes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This is a terrible idea. a) These things aren&#8217;t exactly a danger to anyone. b) The market seems to be doing a pretty good job of taking care of this as both companies cited had suffered bad PR from their misadventures.</p>
<p>Ming is right. This is totally censorship. I can&#8217;t wait to see the unintended consequences of this law of it passes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Masked Millionaire</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8319</link>
		<dc:creator>The Masked Millionaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8319</guid>
		<description>It sounds as if they are trying to outlaw fiction.  There are many examples of tv shows and writing that try to convince you they are real......&quot;War Of The Worlds&quot; ring a bell?  My blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds as if they are trying to outlaw fiction.  There are many examples of tv shows and writing that try to convince you they are real&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;War Of The Worlds&#8221; ring a bell?  My blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Masked Millionaire</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19324</link>
		<dc:creator>The Masked Millionaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19324</guid>
		<description>It sounds as if they are trying to outlaw fiction.  There are many examples of tv shows and writing that try to convince you they are real......&quot;War Of The Worlds&quot; ring a bell?  My blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds as if they are trying to outlaw fiction.  There are many examples of tv shows and writing that try to convince you they are real&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;War Of The Worlds&#8221; ring a bell?  My blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys @ Retro Garden</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8316</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys @ Retro Garden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8316</guid>
		<description>Nice idea, I remember reading that alliwantforchristmasisapsp one, and it was hilariously funny and one of the most catastrophic marketing blunders in history.

But what&#039;s an &quot;astroturf&quot; blog?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea, I remember reading that alliwantforchristmasisapsp one, and it was hilariously funny and one of the most catastrophic marketing blunders in history.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s an &#8220;astroturf&#8221; blog?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys @ Retro Garden</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19323</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys @ Retro Garden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19323</guid>
		<description>Nice idea, I remember reading that alliwantforchristmasisapsp one, and it was hilariously funny and one of the most catastrophic marketing blunders in history.

But what&#039;s an &quot;astroturf&quot; blog?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea, I remember reading that alliwantforchristmasisapsp one, and it was hilariously funny and one of the most catastrophic marketing blunders in history.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s an &#8220;astroturf&#8221; blog?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ming</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8315</link>
		<dc:creator>Ming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-8315</guid>
		<description>sounds like censorship to me... i dunno, i think the people to lose out are bloggers. once peple start to tell you what you can and can&#039;t write... i don&#039;t agree with flogs or splogs..but i think consumers can tell them apart pretty easily...

we lose

that&#039;s my verdict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like censorship to me&#8230; i dunno, i think the people to lose out are bloggers. once peple start to tell you what you can and can&#8217;t write&#8230; i don&#8217;t agree with flogs or splogs..but i think consumers can tell them apart pretty easily&#8230;</p>
<p>we lose</p>
<p>that&#8217;s my verdict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ming</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/fake-blogging-to-be-criminalized-in-uk/#comment-19322</guid>
		<description>sounds like censorship to me... i dunno, i think the people to lose out are bloggers. once peple start to tell you what you can and can&#039;t write... i don&#039;t agree with flogs or splogs..but i think consumers can tell them apart pretty easily...

we lose

that&#039;s my verdict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like censorship to me&#8230; i dunno, i think the people to lose out are bloggers. once peple start to tell you what you can and can&#8217;t write&#8230; i don&#8217;t agree with flogs or splogs..but i think consumers can tell them apart pretty easily&#8230;</p>
<p>we lose</p>
<p>that&#8217;s my verdict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 644/648 objects using apc

Served from: chrisg.com @ 2012-02-09 06:17:46 -->
