<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controversy Versus Consensus, a Writers Dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/</link>
	<description>Build your business by sharing what you know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5355</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5355</guid>
		<description>@Jeremy - Yup, I think the right attitude is all it takes, a lively and respectful discussion is perfect, it is when no discussion is allowed that things get a bit off 

@Michael - I wrote something similar a while ago, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisg.com/why-being-a-success-means-people-are-hating-what-you-do/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to be successful means people hate what you do&lt;/a&gt;

@LAChick - I read blogs for the connection too, although I have been slack with keeping up my commenting lately. Nice quote :)

@Brad - I agree, acknowledging there are other points of view could diffuse any heat from the discussion, as long as it is done in a way that doesn&#039;t dismiss them out of hand. There are a lot of places on the web, political, religious, science vs religion, even IT, where the other side are not given that benefit.

@Rob - Some people naturally spread their ideas and so do not consider what they do as promotion. This reinforces the idea that all you need is great content. In fact if you are not a naturally mixer or networker, if all you do is write great content, then you are relying on luck. Even to be found in a search engine someone has to have linked to you. Other people are as important as our own writing :) Content might be King but a King all on his own is just some guy in a funny hat.

@Sonia - I like that but it depends on how he said it I guess :)

@Jermayn - Keep your personality, just remember to be respectful. Now more than ever it is important to be authentic and people will be attracted by that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremy &#8211; Yup, I think the right attitude is all it takes, a lively and respectful discussion is perfect, it is when no discussion is allowed that things get a bit off </p>
<p>@Michael &#8211; I wrote something similar a while ago, <a href="http://www.chrisg.com/why-being-a-success-means-people-are-hating-what-you-do/" rel="nofollow">to be successful means people hate what you do</a></p>
<p>@LAChick &#8211; I read blogs for the connection too, although I have been slack with keeping up my commenting lately. Nice quote <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Brad &#8211; I agree, acknowledging there are other points of view could diffuse any heat from the discussion, as long as it is done in a way that doesn&#8217;t dismiss them out of hand. There are a lot of places on the web, political, religious, science vs religion, even IT, where the other side are not given that benefit.</p>
<p>@Rob &#8211; Some people naturally spread their ideas and so do not consider what they do as promotion. This reinforces the idea that all you need is great content. In fact if you are not a naturally mixer or networker, if all you do is write great content, then you are relying on luck. Even to be found in a search engine someone has to have linked to you. Other people are as important as our own writing <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Content might be King but a King all on his own is just some guy in a funny hat.</p>
<p>@Sonia &#8211; I like that but it depends on how he said it I guess <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Jermayn &#8211; Keep your personality, just remember to be respectful. Now more than ever it is important to be authentic and people will be attracted by that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17271</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17271</guid>
		<description>@Jeremy - Yup, I think the right attitude is all it takes, a lively and respectful discussion is perfect, it is when no discussion is allowed that things get a bit off 

@Michael - I wrote something similar a while ago, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisg.com/why-being-a-success-means-people-are-hating-what-you-do/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to be successful means people hate what you do&lt;/a&gt;

@LAChick - I read blogs for the connection too, although I have been slack with keeping up my commenting lately. Nice quote :)

@Brad - I agree, acknowledging there are other points of view could diffuse any heat from the discussion, as long as it is done in a way that doesn&#039;t dismiss them out of hand. There are a lot of places on the web, political, religious, science vs religion, even IT, where the other side are not given that benefit.

@Rob - Some people naturally spread their ideas and so do not consider what they do as promotion. This reinforces the idea that all you need is great content. In fact if you are not a naturally mixer or networker, if all you do is write great content, then you are relying on luck. Even to be found in a search engine someone has to have linked to you. Other people are as important as our own writing :) Content might be King but a King all on his own is just some guy in a funny hat.

@Sonia - I like that but it depends on how he said it I guess :)

@Jermayn - Keep your personality, just remember to be respectful. Now more than ever it is important to be authentic and people will be attracted by that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremy &#8211; Yup, I think the right attitude is all it takes, a lively and respectful discussion is perfect, it is when no discussion is allowed that things get a bit off </p>
<p>@Michael &#8211; I wrote something similar a while ago, <a href="http://www.chrisg.com/why-being-a-success-means-people-are-hating-what-you-do/" rel="nofollow">to be successful means people hate what you do</a></p>
<p>@LAChick &#8211; I read blogs for the connection too, although I have been slack with keeping up my commenting lately. Nice quote <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Brad &#8211; I agree, acknowledging there are other points of view could diffuse any heat from the discussion, as long as it is done in a way that doesn&#8217;t dismiss them out of hand. There are a lot of places on the web, political, religious, science vs religion, even IT, where the other side are not given that benefit.</p>
<p>@Rob &#8211; Some people naturally spread their ideas and so do not consider what they do as promotion. This reinforces the idea that all you need is great content. In fact if you are not a naturally mixer or networker, if all you do is write great content, then you are relying on luck. Even to be found in a search engine someone has to have linked to you. Other people are as important as our own writing <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Content might be King but a King all on his own is just some guy in a funny hat.</p>
<p>@Sonia &#8211; I like that but it depends on how he said it I guess <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Jermayn &#8211; Keep your personality, just remember to be respectful. Now more than ever it is important to be authentic and people will be attracted by that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5354</guid>
		<description>By nature I am a &quot;straight shooter&quot; but I find blogging im a lot nicer. Should I change my blogging style??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By nature I am a &#8220;straight shooter&#8221; but I find blogging im a lot nicer. Should I change my blogging style??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17270</guid>
		<description>By nature I am a &quot;straight shooter&quot; but I find blogging im a lot nicer. Should I change my blogging style??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By nature I am a &#8220;straight shooter&#8221; but I find blogging im a lot nicer. Should I change my blogging style??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia Simone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>A colleague of my dad&#039;s had a great technique that I love.  He would rant up, down, and sideways, arguing his point with passion and perhaps a little too much enthusiasm.  Then he would say, &quot;That&#039;s how I see it.  You may see it differently.&quot;

If we can hold that thought--&quot;you might see it differently&quot;--it helps a lot.  And we can be pretty opinionated without being blockheads.

This is very timely for me, as my blog post today might cost me a bunch of subscribers.  (Wait, I don&#039;t have a bunch of subscribers.  OK, it might cost me a significant fraction.)  That is ok.  Sometimes you just feel at peace knowing you said something you had to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of my dad&#8217;s had a great technique that I love.  He would rant up, down, and sideways, arguing his point with passion and perhaps a little too much enthusiasm.  Then he would say, &#8220;That&#8217;s how I see it.  You may see it differently.&#8221;</p>
<p>If we can hold that thought&#8211;&#8221;you might see it differently&#8221;&#8211;it helps a lot.  And we can be pretty opinionated without being blockheads.</p>
<p>This is very timely for me, as my blog post today might cost me a bunch of subscribers.  (Wait, I don&#8217;t have a bunch of subscribers.  OK, it might cost me a significant fraction.)  That is ok.  Sometimes you just feel at peace knowing you said something you had to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia Simone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17269</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17269</guid>
		<description>A colleague of my dad&#039;s had a great technique that I love.  He would rant up, down, and sideways, arguing his point with passion and perhaps a little too much enthusiasm.  Then he would say, &quot;That&#039;s how I see it.  You may see it differently.&quot;

If we can hold that thought--&quot;you might see it differently&quot;--it helps a lot.  And we can be pretty opinionated without being blockheads.

This is very timely for me, as my blog post today might cost me a bunch of subscribers.  (Wait, I don&#039;t have a bunch of subscribers.  OK, it might cost me a significant fraction.)  That is ok.  Sometimes you just feel at peace knowing you said something you had to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of my dad&#8217;s had a great technique that I love.  He would rant up, down, and sideways, arguing his point with passion and perhaps a little too much enthusiasm.  Then he would say, &#8220;That&#8217;s how I see it.  You may see it differently.&#8221;</p>
<p>If we can hold that thought&#8211;&#8221;you might see it differently&#8221;&#8211;it helps a lot.  And we can be pretty opinionated without being blockheads.</p>
<p>This is very timely for me, as my blog post today might cost me a bunch of subscribers.  (Wait, I don&#8217;t have a bunch of subscribers.  OK, it might cost me a significant fraction.)  That is ok.  Sometimes you just feel at peace knowing you said something you had to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5352</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5352</guid>
		<description>1.  I&#039;m not against &#039;paid-for&#039; links either, but it gets kind of annoying being marketed to all the time, especially with the pop-ups I am seeing now on blogs.

2. Agree full heartedly on the &#039;skip-a-day&#039;. I tend to skip many days!  ;)

3. People think blogging makes them money????  ;)  I am with you all the way on this.  In fact if money is the sole reason to blog I don&#039;t see how it could be fun in anyway.  It&#039;s kind of like a job, you either do it cause it&#039;s fun or you do it cause you HAVE to.  Of course, there is some wriggle room on this.

4.  Great content.  Hrmm this is an interesting statement.  Seems today that blogging is now becoming a sort of business enterprise to a certain degree.  I am sure there is a marketing reconnaissance of sorts to blogging today, but I am either intuitively doing the steps or not stepping at all.  I am building a readership based on areas people and I may have in common.  In other words I am looking for resonance in my readership.  I hope people are able to find me, but then again, I am not pushing my blog through a marketing squeeze chute per se.  I guess it all depends on a persons goals and aspirations.  I publicize as much as possible, but I would rather write than market (despite my degree in the topic).  I keep up with two blogs and I blog for fun and I hope it&#039;s information as well, but I would rather people treat my blog as more of a coffee table book of sorts.

I thought this post was really good, and it made me want to respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  I&#8217;m not against &#8216;paid-for&#8217; links either, but it gets kind of annoying being marketed to all the time, especially with the pop-ups I am seeing now on blogs.</p>
<p>2. Agree full heartedly on the &#8216;skip-a-day&#8217;. I tend to skip many days!  <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>3. People think blogging makes them money????  <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I am with you all the way on this.  In fact if money is the sole reason to blog I don&#8217;t see how it could be fun in anyway.  It&#8217;s kind of like a job, you either do it cause it&#8217;s fun or you do it cause you HAVE to.  Of course, there is some wriggle room on this.</p>
<p>4.  Great content.  Hrmm this is an interesting statement.  Seems today that blogging is now becoming a sort of business enterprise to a certain degree.  I am sure there is a marketing reconnaissance of sorts to blogging today, but I am either intuitively doing the steps or not stepping at all.  I am building a readership based on areas people and I may have in common.  In other words I am looking for resonance in my readership.  I hope people are able to find me, but then again, I am not pushing my blog through a marketing squeeze chute per se.  I guess it all depends on a persons goals and aspirations.  I publicize as much as possible, but I would rather write than market (despite my degree in the topic).  I keep up with two blogs and I blog for fun and I hope it&#8217;s information as well, but I would rather people treat my blog as more of a coffee table book of sorts.</p>
<p>I thought this post was really good, and it made me want to respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17268</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17268</guid>
		<description>1.  I&#039;m not against &#039;paid-for&#039; links either, but it gets kind of annoying being marketed to all the time, especially with the pop-ups I am seeing now on blogs.

2. Agree full heartedly on the &#039;skip-a-day&#039;. I tend to skip many days!  ;)

3. People think blogging makes them money????  ;)  I am with you all the way on this.  In fact if money is the sole reason to blog I don&#039;t see how it could be fun in anyway.  It&#039;s kind of like a job, you either do it cause it&#039;s fun or you do it cause you HAVE to.  Of course, there is some wriggle room on this.

4.  Great content.  Hrmm this is an interesting statement.  Seems today that blogging is now becoming a sort of business enterprise to a certain degree.  I am sure there is a marketing reconnaissance of sorts to blogging today, but I am either intuitively doing the steps or not stepping at all.  I am building a readership based on areas people and I may have in common.  In other words I am looking for resonance in my readership.  I hope people are able to find me, but then again, I am not pushing my blog through a marketing squeeze chute per se.  I guess it all depends on a persons goals and aspirations.  I publicize as much as possible, but I would rather write than market (despite my degree in the topic).  I keep up with two blogs and I blog for fun and I hope it&#039;s information as well, but I would rather people treat my blog as more of a coffee table book of sorts.

I thought this post was really good, and it made me want to respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  I&#8217;m not against &#8216;paid-for&#8217; links either, but it gets kind of annoying being marketed to all the time, especially with the pop-ups I am seeing now on blogs.</p>
<p>2. Agree full heartedly on the &#8216;skip-a-day&#8217;. I tend to skip many days!  <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>3. People think blogging makes them money????  <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I am with you all the way on this.  In fact if money is the sole reason to blog I don&#8217;t see how it could be fun in anyway.  It&#8217;s kind of like a job, you either do it cause it&#8217;s fun or you do it cause you HAVE to.  Of course, there is some wriggle room on this.</p>
<p>4.  Great content.  Hrmm this is an interesting statement.  Seems today that blogging is now becoming a sort of business enterprise to a certain degree.  I am sure there is a marketing reconnaissance of sorts to blogging today, but I am either intuitively doing the steps or not stepping at all.  I am building a readership based on areas people and I may have in common.  In other words I am looking for resonance in my readership.  I hope people are able to find me, but then again, I am not pushing my blog through a marketing squeeze chute per se.  I guess it all depends on a persons goals and aspirations.  I publicize as much as possible, but I would rather write than market (despite my degree in the topic).  I keep up with two blogs and I blog for fun and I hope it&#8217;s information as well, but I would rather people treat my blog as more of a coffee table book of sorts.</p>
<p>I thought this post was really good, and it made me want to respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad V.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5349</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5349</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m writing something I know people will disagree with, or there&#039;s an obvious argument against my opinion, I always acknowledge the other side. Just doing that is usually enough to relieve any anger I might cause.

Of course, the topics I write about aren&#039;t all that controversial to begin with, so I suppose that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m writing something I know people will disagree with, or there&#8217;s an obvious argument against my opinion, I always acknowledge the other side. Just doing that is usually enough to relieve any anger I might cause.</p>
<p>Of course, the topics I write about aren&#8217;t all that controversial to begin with, so I suppose that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad V.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17267</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17267</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m writing something I know people will disagree with, or there&#039;s an obvious argument against my opinion, I always acknowledge the other side. Just doing that is usually enough to relieve any anger I might cause.

Of course, the topics I write about aren&#039;t all that controversial to begin with, so I suppose that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m writing something I know people will disagree with, or there&#8217;s an obvious argument against my opinion, I always acknowledge the other side. Just doing that is usually enough to relieve any anger I might cause.</p>
<p>Of course, the topics I write about aren&#8217;t all that controversial to begin with, so I suppose that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAChick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5348</link>
		<dc:creator>LAChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5348</guid>
		<description>As far as consensus is concerned I&#039;m of the opinion that a blog written for &#039;everyone&#039; is really a blog for no one.

I totally agree that how you express your ideas (not all of us can do a Henry Rollins style rant and get away with it) and your debating skills are as important as the actual idea.

Being controversial for the sake of it is about as meaningful as this line from South Park (sorry Chris for childishly bringing it back to this) &quot;you can&#039;t be a non-conformist if you don&#039;t drink coffee.&quot;

I assume though, for all those bloggers out there who have large subscriptions - you&#039;d start to be a little more careful about expressing your ideas and opinions. I don&#039;t think they should though - many people read blogs (including myself) for the connection not just the content - being honest keeps that connection alive. We&#039;re smart us humans - we know when someone&#039;s not being authentic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as consensus is concerned I&#8217;m of the opinion that a blog written for &#8216;everyone&#8217; is really a blog for no one.</p>
<p>I totally agree that how you express your ideas (not all of us can do a Henry Rollins style rant and get away with it) and your debating skills are as important as the actual idea.</p>
<p>Being controversial for the sake of it is about as meaningful as this line from South Park (sorry Chris for childishly bringing it back to this) &#8220;you can&#8217;t be a non-conformist if you don&#8217;t drink coffee.&#8221;</p>
<p>I assume though, for all those bloggers out there who have large subscriptions &#8211; you&#8217;d start to be a little more careful about expressing your ideas and opinions. I don&#8217;t think they should though &#8211; many people read blogs (including myself) for the connection not just the content &#8211; being honest keeps that connection alive. We&#8217;re smart us humans &#8211; we know when someone&#8217;s not being authentic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAChick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17266</link>
		<dc:creator>LAChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17266</guid>
		<description>As far as consensus is concerned I&#039;m of the opinion that a blog written for &#039;everyone&#039; is really a blog for no one.

I totally agree that how you express your ideas (not all of us can do a Henry Rollins style rant and get away with it) and your debating skills are as important as the actual idea.

Being controversial for the sake of it is about as meaningful as this line from South Park (sorry Chris for childishly bringing it back to this) &quot;you can&#039;t be a non-conformist if you don&#039;t drink coffee.&quot;

I assume though, for all those bloggers out there who have large subscriptions - you&#039;d start to be a little more careful about expressing your ideas and opinions. I don&#039;t think they should though - many people read blogs (including myself) for the connection not just the content - being honest keeps that connection alive. We&#039;re smart us humans - we know when someone&#039;s not being authentic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as consensus is concerned I&#8217;m of the opinion that a blog written for &#8216;everyone&#8217; is really a blog for no one.</p>
<p>I totally agree that how you express your ideas (not all of us can do a Henry Rollins style rant and get away with it) and your debating skills are as important as the actual idea.</p>
<p>Being controversial for the sake of it is about as meaningful as this line from South Park (sorry Chris for childishly bringing it back to this) &#8220;you can&#8217;t be a non-conformist if you don&#8217;t drink coffee.&#8221;</p>
<p>I assume though, for all those bloggers out there who have large subscriptions &#8211; you&#8217;d start to be a little more careful about expressing your ideas and opinions. I don&#8217;t think they should though &#8211; many people read blogs (including myself) for the connection not just the content &#8211; being honest keeps that connection alive. We&#8217;re smart us humans &#8211; we know when someone&#8217;s not being authentic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5347</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5347</guid>
		<description>The person and the personality behind the blog is important to people. It&#039;s why they stay after they visit for the first time. Most bloggers would benefit from being more opinionated (provided you can argue your case well and not be a jerk), not less. 

Notice how some people are constantly polarizing everyone and how attention follows them wherever they go. I don&#039;t know who said this but I remember more than once hearing a saying that goes something like: If you&#039;re not making enemies, you&#039;re not doing anything important enough.

That&#039;s a little strong, but you get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person and the personality behind the blog is important to people. It&#8217;s why they stay after they visit for the first time. Most bloggers would benefit from being more opinionated (provided you can argue your case well and not be a jerk), not less. </p>
<p>Notice how some people are constantly polarizing everyone and how attention follows them wherever they go. I don&#8217;t know who said this but I remember more than once hearing a saying that goes something like: If you&#8217;re not making enemies, you&#8217;re not doing anything important enough.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a little strong, but you get the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17265</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17265</guid>
		<description>The person and the personality behind the blog is important to people. It&#039;s why they stay after they visit for the first time. Most bloggers would benefit from being more opinionated (provided you can argue your case well and not be a jerk), not less. 

Notice how some people are constantly polarizing everyone and how attention follows them wherever they go. I don&#039;t know who said this but I remember more than once hearing a saying that goes something like: If you&#039;re not making enemies, you&#039;re not doing anything important enough.

That&#039;s a little strong, but you get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person and the personality behind the blog is important to people. It&#8217;s why they stay after they visit for the first time. Most bloggers would benefit from being more opinionated (provided you can argue your case well and not be a jerk), not less. </p>
<p>Notice how some people are constantly polarizing everyone and how attention follows them wherever they go. I don&#8217;t know who said this but I remember more than once hearing a saying that goes something like: If you&#8217;re not making enemies, you&#8217;re not doing anything important enough.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a little strong, but you get the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5345</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5345</guid>
		<description>True as always, Chris. If you come off having a strong opinion on something, yes, it can lose you some readers, but it&#039;s better than coming off as avoiding holding an opinion.
However, four and five are very important points. If you&#039;re not polite and open to discussion then you&#039;ll likely come off as an ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True as always, Chris. If you come off having a strong opinion on something, yes, it can lose you some readers, but it&#8217;s better than coming off as avoiding holding an opinion.<br />
However, four and five are very important points. If you&#8217;re not polite and open to discussion then you&#8217;ll likely come off as an ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17264</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17264</guid>
		<description>True as always, Chris. If you come off having a strong opinion on something, yes, it can lose you some readers, but it&#039;s better than coming off as avoiding holding an opinion.
However, four and five are very important points. If you&#039;re not polite and open to discussion then you&#039;ll likely come off as an ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True as always, Chris. If you come off having a strong opinion on something, yes, it can lose you some readers, but it&#8217;s better than coming off as avoiding holding an opinion.<br />
However, four and five are very important points. If you&#8217;re not polite and open to discussion then you&#8217;ll likely come off as an ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5344</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5344</guid>
		<description>Exactly, thanks for that :) Your last point rings true for me especially Joanna, early on in the history of this blog I posted what basically turned out to be a rant and it sat uneasily with me for a while until I had to go back and edit it. While I wish I had never posted in that way at all I felt I could live with what I had written far more when I had a chance to look carefully at what I was doing. If we are prepared to take the rewards from what we produce we should also be willing to accept the other consequences too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, thanks for that <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Your last point rings true for me especially Joanna, early on in the history of this blog I posted what basically turned out to be a rant and it sat uneasily with me for a while until I had to go back and edit it. While I wish I had never posted in that way at all I felt I could live with what I had written far more when I had a chance to look carefully at what I was doing. If we are prepared to take the rewards from what we produce we should also be willing to accept the other consequences too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17263</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17263</guid>
		<description>Exactly, thanks for that :) Your last point rings true for me especially Joanna, early on in the history of this blog I posted what basically turned out to be a rant and it sat uneasily with me for a while until I had to go back and edit it. While I wish I had never posted in that way at all I felt I could live with what I had written far more when I had a chance to look carefully at what I was doing. If we are prepared to take the rewards from what we produce we should also be willing to accept the other consequences too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, thanks for that <img src='http://www.chrisg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Your last point rings true for me especially Joanna, early on in the history of this blog I posted what basically turned out to be a rant and it sat uneasily with me for a while until I had to go back and edit it. While I wish I had never posted in that way at all I felt I could live with what I had written far more when I had a chance to look carefully at what I was doing. If we are prepared to take the rewards from what we produce we should also be willing to accept the other consequences too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna Young</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5342</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-5342</guid>
		<description>Chris, thanks for addressing this issue.  I think the key is your point 3 - owning your own words.  

For  me that means writing what you hold to be true when it needs to be said (rather than stirring up controversy for the sake of it).  

And owning includes taking responsibility for the consequences - like living with it if readers drift away - but perhaps also asking ourselves if we got the tone right in the way we wrote (or did we drift into ranting/opinionated), being ready to step down and apologise if you get things wrong - and so on.

Joanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks for addressing this issue.  I think the key is your point 3 &#8211; owning your own words.  </p>
<p>For  me that means writing what you hold to be true when it needs to be said (rather than stirring up controversy for the sake of it).  </p>
<p>And owning includes taking responsibility for the consequences &#8211; like living with it if readers drift away &#8211; but perhaps also asking ourselves if we got the tone right in the way we wrote (or did we drift into ranting/opinionated), being ready to step down and apologise if you get things wrong &#8211; and so on.</p>
<p>Joanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna Young</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17262</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/contraversy-versus-consensus-a-writers-dilemma/#comment-17262</guid>
		<description>Chris, thanks for addressing this issue.  I think the key is your point 3 - owning your own words.  

For  me that means writing what you hold to be true when it needs to be said (rather than stirring up controversy for the sake of it).  

And owning includes taking responsibility for the consequences - like living with it if readers drift away - but perhaps also asking ourselves if we got the tone right in the way we wrote (or did we drift into ranting/opinionated), being ready to step down and apologise if you get things wrong - and so on.

Joanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks for addressing this issue.  I think the key is your point 3 &#8211; owning your own words.  </p>
<p>For  me that means writing what you hold to be true when it needs to be said (rather than stirring up controversy for the sake of it).  </p>
<p>And owning includes taking responsibility for the consequences &#8211; like living with it if readers drift away &#8211; but perhaps also asking ourselves if we got the tone right in the way we wrote (or did we drift into ranting/opinionated), being ready to step down and apologise if you get things wrong &#8211; and so on.</p>
<p>Joanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 692/696 objects using apc

Served from: chrisg.com @ 2012-02-09 06:52:23 -->
