<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Good Reason to NOT Have a Blogroll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/</link>
	<description>Build your business by sharing what you know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not the biggest fan of blog rolls. I think they are going along like links pages did, and blog rolls are often too generic to really be all that good. But I also think they are very tempting for people who look at their Technorati ranking, where so much can depend on the number of inbound links.

I&#039;m playing with it a little, but unless I get positive results, Technorati ranking notwithstanding, I&#039;ll cheerfully drop blog rolls. If it doesn&#039;t work, what&#039;s the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the biggest fan of blog rolls. I think they are going along like links pages did, and blog rolls are often too generic to really be all that good. But I also think they are very tempting for people who look at their Technorati ranking, where so much can depend on the number of inbound links.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m playing with it a little, but unless I get positive results, Technorati ranking notwithstanding, I&#8217;ll cheerfully drop blog rolls. If it doesn&#8217;t work, what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14230</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14230</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not the biggest fan of blog rolls. I think they are going along like links pages did, and blog rolls are often too generic to really be all that good. But I also think they are very tempting for people who look at their Technorati ranking, where so much can depend on the number of inbound links.

I&#039;m playing with it a little, but unless I get positive results, Technorati ranking notwithstanding, I&#039;ll cheerfully drop blog rolls. If it doesn&#039;t work, what&#039;s the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the biggest fan of blog rolls. I think they are going along like links pages did, and blog rolls are often too generic to really be all that good. But I also think they are very tempting for people who look at their Technorati ranking, where so much can depend on the number of inbound links.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m playing with it a little, but unless I get positive results, Technorati ranking notwithstanding, I&#8217;ll cheerfully drop blog rolls. If it doesn&#8217;t work, what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I am new with only two posts to my resume so for. When I set up my word press blog I noticed the blog roll. Hum, what is that I thought? Thanks for more insite on the blog roll. Now I have to figure out where I fall on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am new with only two posts to my resume so for. When I set up my word press blog I noticed the blog roll. Hum, what is that I thought? Thanks for more insite on the blog roll. Now I have to figure out where I fall on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14229</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14229</guid>
		<description>I am new with only two posts to my resume so for. When I set up my word press blog I noticed the blog roll. Hum, what is that I thought? Thanks for more insite on the blog roll. Now I have to figure out where I fall on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am new with only two posts to my resume so for. When I set up my word press blog I noticed the blog roll. Hum, what is that I thought? Thanks for more insite on the blog roll. Now I have to figure out where I fall on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Never been a fan of blogrolls as a reciprocal tool. I do have a section called &quot;blogs I read&quot;, which I think has two entries at the moment. I like knowing who other bloggers are reading, but I couldn&#039;t care less who their best buddies or link-trading partners are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never been a fan of blogrolls as a reciprocal tool. I do have a section called &#8220;blogs I read&#8221;, which I think has two entries at the moment. I like knowing who other bloggers are reading, but I couldn&#8217;t care less who their best buddies or link-trading partners are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14228</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14228</guid>
		<description>Never been a fan of blogrolls as a reciprocal tool. I do have a section called &quot;blogs I read&quot;, which I think has two entries at the moment. I like knowing who other bloggers are reading, but I couldn&#039;t care less who their best buddies or link-trading partners are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never been a fan of blogrolls as a reciprocal tool. I do have a section called &#8220;blogs I read&#8221;, which I think has two entries at the moment. I like knowing who other bloggers are reading, but I couldn&#8217;t care less who their best buddies or link-trading partners are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I do agree that pruning the blogroll hurts the little guy, but at the same time there are ways of managing the blogroll without cutting the number of blogs listed on it.

For example: although mine has lots of links in one category, I&#039;ve limited the number to 5, and it&#039;s a random 5 each and every time a page is loaded. Sure, there are fewer actual blogs listed per page, but all the links on the roll have about the same amount of exposure on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree that pruning the blogroll hurts the little guy, but at the same time there are ways of managing the blogroll without cutting the number of blogs listed on it.</p>
<p>For example: although mine has lots of links in one category, I&#8217;ve limited the number to 5, and it&#8217;s a random 5 each and every time a page is loaded. Sure, there are fewer actual blogs listed per page, but all the links on the roll have about the same amount of exposure on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14227</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14227</guid>
		<description>I do agree that pruning the blogroll hurts the little guy, but at the same time there are ways of managing the blogroll without cutting the number of blogs listed on it.

For example: although mine has lots of links in one category, I&#039;ve limited the number to 5, and it&#039;s a random 5 each and every time a page is loaded. Sure, there are fewer actual blogs listed per page, but all the links on the roll have about the same amount of exposure on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree that pruning the blogroll hurts the little guy, but at the same time there are ways of managing the blogroll without cutting the number of blogs listed on it.</p>
<p>For example: although mine has lots of links in one category, I&#8217;ve limited the number to 5, and it&#8217;s a random 5 each and every time a page is loaded. Sure, there are fewer actual blogs listed per page, but all the links on the roll have about the same amount of exposure on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I think it is better, I think there can also be value to your readers in having a blogroll. I am just not sure how to quantify that value. 

I also think that SEO and pandering to the Search Engines has messed up our idea of how and who we should link to in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is better, I think there can also be value to your readers in having a blogroll. I am just not sure how to quantify that value. </p>
<p>I also think that SEO and pandering to the Search Engines has messed up our idea of how and who we should link to in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14226</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14226</guid>
		<description>I think it is better, I think there can also be value to your readers in having a blogroll. I am just not sure how to quantify that value. 

I also think that SEO and pandering to the Search Engines has messed up our idea of how and who we should link to in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is better, I think there can also be value to your readers in having a blogroll. I am just not sure how to quantify that value. </p>
<p>I also think that SEO and pandering to the Search Engines has messed up our idea of how and who we should link to in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Shanley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Shanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. Context is important. The problem with a post link as opposed to a blogroll link, though, is that the post very quickly gets buried in the archives, whereas the blogroll doesn&#039;t. So why not do both?

It does seem that the bigger a blogger gets, the less likely he or she is to have a blogroll. Whether that&#039;s because they don&#039;t need the link love any more, so therefore also don&#039;t feel the need to share it, or because of the hurt feelings at the playground thing you mention, or just plain not wanting to be bothered anymore--blogrolls do often seem to go the way of the dodo bird, the higher up in the blogosphere one goes.

I think for newer bloggers and bloggers climbing their way up the ranks, blogrolls still provide a helpful service to readers and to bloggers. Especially if that blogger isn&#039;t in one of the big 5 blog areas--tech, politcal, entertainment, big business, or journalism.

No doubt, we&#039;d all love to get so popular that we could make our blogrolls obsolete. (Said tongue-in-cheek)If I ever get there, I&#039;ll be sure to remember your article to help assuage my guilt for dumping the other bloggers who helped get me there.

Kidding aside. Your points are well taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. Context is important. The problem with a post link as opposed to a blogroll link, though, is that the post very quickly gets buried in the archives, whereas the blogroll doesn&#8217;t. So why not do both?</p>
<p>It does seem that the bigger a blogger gets, the less likely he or she is to have a blogroll. Whether that&#8217;s because they don&#8217;t need the link love any more, so therefore also don&#8217;t feel the need to share it, or because of the hurt feelings at the playground thing you mention, or just plain not wanting to be bothered anymore&#8211;blogrolls do often seem to go the way of the dodo bird, the higher up in the blogosphere one goes.</p>
<p>I think for newer bloggers and bloggers climbing their way up the ranks, blogrolls still provide a helpful service to readers and to bloggers. Especially if that blogger isn&#8217;t in one of the big 5 blog areas&#8211;tech, politcal, entertainment, big business, or journalism.</p>
<p>No doubt, we&#8217;d all love to get so popular that we could make our blogrolls obsolete. (Said tongue-in-cheek)If I ever get there, I&#8217;ll be sure to remember your article to help assuage my guilt for dumping the other bloggers who helped get me there.</p>
<p>Kidding aside. Your points are well taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Shanley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14225</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Shanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14225</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. Context is important. The problem with a post link as opposed to a blogroll link, though, is that the post very quickly gets buried in the archives, whereas the blogroll doesn&#039;t. So why not do both?

It does seem that the bigger a blogger gets, the less likely he or she is to have a blogroll. Whether that&#039;s because they don&#039;t need the link love any more, so therefore also don&#039;t feel the need to share it, or because of the hurt feelings at the playground thing you mention, or just plain not wanting to be bothered anymore--blogrolls do often seem to go the way of the dodo bird, the higher up in the blogosphere one goes.

I think for newer bloggers and bloggers climbing their way up the ranks, blogrolls still provide a helpful service to readers and to bloggers. Especially if that blogger isn&#039;t in one of the big 5 blog areas--tech, politcal, entertainment, big business, or journalism.

No doubt, we&#039;d all love to get so popular that we could make our blogrolls obsolete. (Said tongue-in-cheek)If I ever get there, I&#039;ll be sure to remember your article to help assuage my guilt for dumping the other bloggers who helped get me there.

Kidding aside. Your points are well taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. Context is important. The problem with a post link as opposed to a blogroll link, though, is that the post very quickly gets buried in the archives, whereas the blogroll doesn&#8217;t. So why not do both?</p>
<p>It does seem that the bigger a blogger gets, the less likely he or she is to have a blogroll. Whether that&#8217;s because they don&#8217;t need the link love any more, so therefore also don&#8217;t feel the need to share it, or because of the hurt feelings at the playground thing you mention, or just plain not wanting to be bothered anymore&#8211;blogrolls do often seem to go the way of the dodo bird, the higher up in the blogosphere one goes.</p>
<p>I think for newer bloggers and bloggers climbing their way up the ranks, blogrolls still provide a helpful service to readers and to bloggers. Especially if that blogger isn&#8217;t in one of the big 5 blog areas&#8211;tech, politcal, entertainment, big business, or journalism.</p>
<p>No doubt, we&#8217;d all love to get so popular that we could make our blogrolls obsolete. (Said tongue-in-cheek)If I ever get there, I&#8217;ll be sure to remember your article to help assuage my guilt for dumping the other bloggers who helped get me there.</p>
<p>Kidding aside. Your points are well taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Yes they can be valuable to visitors, but I would argue a proper post giving good reasons for why someone should visit a particular blog is even better. Context is important, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they can be valuable to visitors, but I would argue a proper post giving good reasons for why someone should visit a particular blog is even better. Context is important, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14224</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14224</guid>
		<description>Yes they can be valuable to visitors, but I would argue a proper post giving good reasons for why someone should visit a particular blog is even better. Context is important, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they can be valuable to visitors, but I would argue a proper post giving good reasons for why someone should visit a particular blog is even better. Context is important, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Chris I am on the fence with blogrolls. I can see their value, but I am starting to wonder about the issue of maintaining them. I used to find links pages very useful. I would look for links on specific topics and find a slew of good sites related to that topic, until...

people started creating those automated directories with tons and tons of reciprocal links on their sites. What a waste those are! They are useless from a users perspective. 

I think a blogroll can be usefull to your visitors if you link to blogs that your visitors will enjoy you sharing. It&#039;s all about your visitors, right? You want the user experience to be great. If you have a ton of blogroll links, it&#039;s going to be worthless. Maybe in that case adding a categorized link directory would be better for your users. While linking only to good articles makes some sense, is it best for the visitors of your blog?  Maybe, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris I am on the fence with blogrolls. I can see their value, but I am starting to wonder about the issue of maintaining them. I used to find links pages very useful. I would look for links on specific topics and find a slew of good sites related to that topic, until&#8230;</p>
<p>people started creating those automated directories with tons and tons of reciprocal links on their sites. What a waste those are! They are useless from a users perspective. </p>
<p>I think a blogroll can be usefull to your visitors if you link to blogs that your visitors will enjoy you sharing. It&#8217;s all about your visitors, right? You want the user experience to be great. If you have a ton of blogroll links, it&#8217;s going to be worthless. Maybe in that case adding a categorized link directory would be better for your users. While linking only to good articles makes some sense, is it best for the visitors of your blog?  Maybe, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14223</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14223</guid>
		<description>Chris I am on the fence with blogrolls. I can see their value, but I am starting to wonder about the issue of maintaining them. I used to find links pages very useful. I would look for links on specific topics and find a slew of good sites related to that topic, until...

people started creating those automated directories with tons and tons of reciprocal links on their sites. What a waste those are! They are useless from a users perspective. 

I think a blogroll can be usefull to your visitors if you link to blogs that your visitors will enjoy you sharing. It&#039;s all about your visitors, right? You want the user experience to be great. If you have a ton of blogroll links, it&#039;s going to be worthless. Maybe in that case adding a categorized link directory would be better for your users. While linking only to good articles makes some sense, is it best for the visitors of your blog?  Maybe, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris I am on the fence with blogrolls. I can see their value, but I am starting to wonder about the issue of maintaining them. I used to find links pages very useful. I would look for links on specific topics and find a slew of good sites related to that topic, until&#8230;</p>
<p>people started creating those automated directories with tons and tons of reciprocal links on their sites. What a waste those are! They are useless from a users perspective. </p>
<p>I think a blogroll can be usefull to your visitors if you link to blogs that your visitors will enjoy you sharing. It&#8217;s all about your visitors, right? You want the user experience to be great. If you have a ton of blogroll links, it&#8217;s going to be worthless. Maybe in that case adding a categorized link directory would be better for your users. While linking only to good articles makes some sense, is it best for the visitors of your blog?  Maybe, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slade</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Slade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your reasoning about not doing blogrolls.

Links are money in the Economy of Attention - they are a priority VALUE sytem. 

Being transparent and genuine in deciding who is worthy of sharing your attention... It&#039;s not unlike a form of promiscuity, really.

I&#039;m not advocating total Link Celibacy, but I do believe I am responsible to the value of my links - I handle them as valuable, I give them as valuable, and I receive them with the same level of respect. 

A judgement is made upon You, Your Blog, Your Brand - a reflection - trying to get Big Popular People to like you is never genuinely effective.

The Goal is to create superior content, and have a good reason to ally yourself with identify what you respect, and reward that with your recommendation. 

When it is reciprocated by those you hope become your peers - then you know you&#039;re in the right company and that you deserve to be in that company - for the best reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your reasoning about not doing blogrolls.</p>
<p>Links are money in the Economy of Attention &#8211; they are a priority VALUE sytem. </p>
<p>Being transparent and genuine in deciding who is worthy of sharing your attention&#8230; It&#8217;s not unlike a form of promiscuity, really.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not advocating total Link Celibacy, but I do believe I am responsible to the value of my links &#8211; I handle them as valuable, I give them as valuable, and I receive them with the same level of respect. </p>
<p>A judgement is made upon You, Your Blog, Your Brand &#8211; a reflection &#8211; trying to get Big Popular People to like you is never genuinely effective.</p>
<p>The Goal is to create superior content, and have a good reason to ally yourself with identify what you respect, and reward that with your recommendation. </p>
<p>When it is reciprocated by those you hope become your peers &#8211; then you know you&#8217;re in the right company and that you deserve to be in that company &#8211; for the best reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slade</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14222</link>
		<dc:creator>Slade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14222</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your reasoning about not doing blogrolls.

Links are money in the Economy of Attention - they are a priority VALUE sytem. 

Being transparent and genuine in deciding who is worthy of sharing your attention... It&#039;s not unlike a form of promiscuity, really.

I&#039;m not advocating total Link Celibacy, but I do believe I am responsible to the value of my links - I handle them as valuable, I give them as valuable, and I receive them with the same level of respect. 

A judgement is made upon You, Your Blog, Your Brand - a reflection - trying to get Big Popular People to like you is never genuinely effective.

The Goal is to create superior content, and have a good reason to ally yourself with identify what you respect, and reward that with your recommendation. 

When it is reciprocated by those you hope become your peers - then you know you&#039;re in the right company and that you deserve to be in that company - for the best reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your reasoning about not doing blogrolls.</p>
<p>Links are money in the Economy of Attention &#8211; they are a priority VALUE sytem. </p>
<p>Being transparent and genuine in deciding who is worthy of sharing your attention&#8230; It&#8217;s not unlike a form of promiscuity, really.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not advocating total Link Celibacy, but I do believe I am responsible to the value of my links &#8211; I handle them as valuable, I give them as valuable, and I receive them with the same level of respect. </p>
<p>A judgement is made upon You, Your Blog, Your Brand &#8211; a reflection &#8211; trying to get Big Popular People to like you is never genuinely effective.</p>
<p>The Goal is to create superior content, and have a good reason to ally yourself with identify what you respect, and reward that with your recommendation. </p>
<p>When it is reciprocated by those you hope become your peers &#8211; then you know you&#8217;re in the right company and that you deserve to be in that company &#8211; for the best reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I encourage you to disagree, it is good for all of us to see all sides :O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage you to disagree, it is good for all of us to see all sides :O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14221</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisg.com/another-good-reason-to-not-have-a-blogroll/#comment-14221</guid>
		<description>I encourage you to disagree, it is good for all of us to see all sides :O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage you to disagree, it is good for all of us to see all sides :O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 644/648 objects using apc

Served from: chrisg.com @ 2012-02-09 06:32:14 -->
